Nice to meet you online dating

Red pill online dating

“The Red Piller’s Guide to Online Dating”,A Cassie Jaye Documentary

Welcome to The Red Pill, an Internet community on Reddit founded on the general belief that women have it better than men. Red Pill is not a dating advice bulletin, but rather a forum for AdFind Your Special Someone Online. Choose the Right Dating Site & Start Now!Date in Your Area · Dating Sites Comparison · Start Dating Online! · Meet Canadian SinglesTypes: All Ages Dating Sites, Senior Dating Sites, Gay Dating Sites AdCreate an Online Dating Profile for Free! Only Pay When You Want More Features! Make a Free Dating Site Profile! Only Pay When You're Ready to Start Communicating! AdTry the #1 Military Dating Site Today. Over 1M Members. Join in 30 Seconds! Safe & Secure Dating. Safe & Secure. Start Meeting Military Locals, blogger.com by Cupid Media · Mobile Friendly · 1 Million Members · Safe & SecureService catalog: Instant Messaging, Send Interest, Make Connections  · September 15, upvotes. /r/ TheRedPill. TL;DR- This is a concise and heavily updated guide on how to approach dating sites. Most of this guide has been altered ... read more

Also I should note - I never get flakes. And I get laid so much on the first date it's ridiculous. A big reason for this is I'm priming them before the date, I'm not bullying them into a meeting where they aren't comfortable. If you've been really cold and talking about sex or they haven't talked to you beyond giving you their number, the meeting is going to be like meeting a random person on the street.

It's going to take more work at the date to get comfortable. As a former salesman, I'd just add it's not just getting a 'yes' that is important, it's getting them to think 'YES! I don't doubt that this worked for you but I've had more success focusing on hinting at sex.

You don't want to be overt about it, no "u want sum fuk? Something like "We're easily the hottest people on this site, I'm pretty sure it's our duty to create the next generation of models". The chicks that want to bone on the first date want guys that are sexual and fun. I agree with the rest of your tips, but avoiding the sexual talk hasn't really worked for me in the past. yea sometimes I'll fit that type of talk in, especially if I have doubts about her purpose e.

vague profile, single photo, might want to gauge her reaction. But from what I've seen of the competition girls have shown me messages , there is a temptation to search for spank bank material rather than to actually have sex. guys trying to start sex chat. That's what should be avoided. and my approach doesn't work for everyone, I've been accused of seeming cold to girls because I didn't use pet names and talk a lot about their bodies when we first met.

I guess I've got more of a quick strike mentality, where the goal is to get them to my house and make things sexual there. I must disagree with this response. The over-investment implied will serve as nothing more than a self-deprecation.

I'd argue that this is beginning in an implied over-investment. You don't know this woman and immediately you're asking her details about herself. You're also limiting your range across the board. You'd have to actually read the bios of every girl you're interested in, pick out something unique about each one, then cater a question to her. That's time consuming. It also significantly increases your actual investment in the entire process.

Use her response to start a conversation, blablabla that's so interesting then ask another question. Again, asking personal or detailed questions to a women you've never met conveys an over-investment.

I've had fat chicks ask me about details on my bio and I've been immediately pu off, so I know other LSSWs think the same thing if we do it. Their comfort shouldn't matter to you. Your convenience should. If they can't meet at a time or place convenient to you, move on.

If you cater to each and every LSSW that responds, that may be. But that's an over-investment on your part. You're adapting your schedule and time to better suit theirs, which is a weakness in frame. Or you can skip the date altogether and invite them to your place. This statement feels like it stems from a fear of confrontation; you're afraid of offending her, so you tell her what she likes to hear in order to get in her pants.

The sex means too much to you. Again, if your SMV is in check, she'll be comfortable in a dive bar amongst thieves and harlots. Her comfort isn't something you should have to work at to establish. Different strokes, I guess. I tried the tough guy approach and found it significantly limited my pool. As for overinvestment, it doesn't really take a lot of time to do what I said. The next girl I'm meeting? I told her her hat was awesome, and asked her where she bought it.

To me it's not an overinvestment, it's an excuse to initiate a conversation. If the girl is attracted to you, she'll appreciate it for what it is no matter how stupid or inane and engage.

I suppose this also depends on your preference - I like meeting new people, and talking to them, so for me it isn't an investment at all. If I can have an interesting conversation with someone, that fits my approach and is enjoyable for me. Her comfort does matter to me insofar as she feels comfortable enough to decide to meet me and eventually have sex. And personally I'm not comfortable inviting a stranger to my house, I'd much rather meet them for coffee and have at least a short date to make everything feel less 'arranged.

And it isn't all a manipulation on my part - I genuinely enjoy talking to new people, I'm good at it, so I'm playing to my strengths. I think any sort of one-size-fits-all, acronym-laden approach is going to not suit a lot of people.

It's like you said, mate, different strokes. What works for you will work for you, and it's great. But I do think you have a lot of wrong ideas and approaches in your main post. And I don't think these approaches you praech is good for self-image. It's not tough guy approach as you put it, it's simply an approach that caters your own instead of theirs. It's a real pain reading bios and trying to "come up" with shit. And your self-image is the most imporant thing.

Just because you say that you feel great about it, doesn't mean you actually mean it. You will still subconsciously know that you're of low SMV, because you'll feel the over-investment everytime you sit aorund trying to get their attention.

You also said it yourself, that you aren't comfortable inviting a stranger to your house. OP commented that you have a fear of offending her, which means that you don't think you're good enough to offend her. Maybe it's related to your self-image. From my experience, girls get a lot more comfortable with you, real quick, when you bring her up to your place as soon as you meet her not necessarily to do anything sexual, just say you wanna pick up your sunglasses.

IMO, the worst place to have a first date, is somewhere like a café. It's unnatural to sit with a table between you. Even if there's not a table between you, it's still unnatural to sit either towards each other who the fuck wanna do that or both facing straight not looking at each other at least as fucked up as the other option.

OP had a great advice, just skip the "date" and invite them to your place. blackdragon agrees with OmLaLa - he recommends you don't even read the profile - too much investment, so I'm with OmLaLa with this. And why? It's a numbers game - imagine read a long rambling talk, messaging and of course she doesn't even bother replying to you to your crafted message no point in reading it in the first place.

Sorry but you have a lot to gain when you talk about sex before you meet them. A lot. Don't make it THE topic of discussion the first time you introduce yourself online but make it flirty and gradually get more sexual when you get the number. By the time you end up meeting them in person you'll be pretty much guaranteed action because they understand the mindset you have for them.

As cheesy as this sounds this requires texting game and risk is a must. I agree about minimalist profiles. Going in depth about yourself shows over-investment and opens the door to saying something she doesn't like. It also looks like you're trying to impress. Women like mystery, then they can fill in the blanks on their own and imagination is often more interesting than reality.

On okcupid if you fill out every section and answer a certain number of questions then your profile will become more visible. This can be achieved with short one word or one sentence answers. I usually don't say I'm looking for friends either. I imagine some women might take that quite literally. I usually say "a nice girl" which is both true and vague enough to not really mean anything. Now, I screen pretty strongly for sex; I think that accounts for my numbers being a bit lopsided as the interaction moves forward.

My initial success is a bit tougher, but it pays off later on. I went on Tinder briefly. My profile pics were reasonable but no shirt off I'm not jacked yet and didn't have any pics with women that I felt OK about posting only ex gf etc.

After this it went downhill got almost no meets and no lays. Granted, I don't meet up with 27 women every week, but going off of those that either agree or ask to meet, that's usually where it stands.

the most distressing thing a man notices in his pursuit and evolution of online dating from 1st profile and message to maximizing his success rate is the painful realization of WHAT WORKS and what doesn't and how that reflects on women in society. I'll put some pictures up of me, they don't HAVE to be the best ones because women care about personality right? I'll message women I believe are in my league not fat with a well thought out highly intellectual message explaining to them why I am interested in them, what I liked about their profile, and why we should get a drink sometime.

End Strategy: Maximize your physical attraction in your pictures AS MUCH AS possible. Go as far as to use photoshop to hide blemishes. Covertly put shirtless pictures up in natural settings to show off your body. Forget highly intellectual message - be short, direct and brief. NEVER tell her that you find her attractive or pretty.

A man goes from presenting himself as the best person possible to presenting himself as the most attractive product on the shelf. Women base their shopping off the label all the time with no appreciation for what's inside. It's why we've seen such a boom in Marketing during the last generation. Not if, but when she ask you about the past girl you where TALKING TO just tell her that the lady girl was boring. She will get very insecure and try harder.

Happened to me last night. I got asked almost immediately how many girls I've met so far. Told her I don't keep track but they were pretty boring. An hour later she was in my bed moaning. Another tip: tell her something brutally honest you don't like about girls, bbbuuutttt make sure she doesn't have it. I tell girls im very particular about nipples. I hate big nipples, they will send nudes very soon after. How many girls will actually respond to "K"? This is a good guide overall, I just feel like many won't bother responding to a one word answer like that, especially when they presumably are getting hundreds of other messages.

When your SMV is a margin above hers, and you're making it clear you know that, why wouldn't she respond? Yours will be different even if it's a single letter. Yet I'm pretty sure the majority are "hey" to start. It's even in their profile. If the responds it's a sure date. If she doesn't next her.

I like to give those responses at one point to weed out the flakes. I've followed your previous post's advice with great results so this is not a critique but more of clarifying questions. To me it seems like you're placating to the times she is available. Same goes for "whenever" when being ask to meet up. To me this seems like it goes against the whole men are in control and women want to be led idea.

Wouldn't it be more manly to dictate time and place? Responding with something like "X time at X location. This seems to be against the consensus in most RP materials. Outright saying your wants is successful, or at least has been for me. I guess I'm just interested in a discussion of how and why this has been successful for you since it does not seem to be the norm. I think the main point here is being different, and in this day and age, being different means showing you don't really give a shit.

As for 3, one point of distinction is texting before she considers us a real person versus when she has met us and knows we exist. The vagueness and flakiness is perhaps better for the former in order to spin the hamster wheel and force her to think about us as real people and wonder what we're thinking about.

I'm just interested in a discussion of how and why this has been successful for you since it does not seem to be the norm. I read the original LSSW series that OP wrote and I was struck by how much of the details but not the big picture seemed to contradict things I understand about TRP.

Some of his convos went something like:. him: "what are you looking for? And you? Do you want to hang out and be friends? Saw an RSD video about "let's meet up as friends. Online dating is a great teaching tool for guys who still struggle with putting women on a pedastel.

Read those profiles, and you will quickly learn how boring and fucking basic the majority of them are. You realize quickly just how more interesting you are compared to them. It helps you realize that girls are really looking for an interesting guy so they can join in on the activities. RSD Tyler puts it as 'a man is an island with a strong grounded reality. A woman is a boat with no reality and she goes from island to island experiencing different realities.

But she has no reality of her own. That tidbit is actually striking me much harder than any TRP theory short of the misandry bubble. I have a very good amount of success with online dating, getting more dates per week than I can actually go on. That said, I don't agree with many of these statements, though I do see the logic and reasoning in them. Many of them I also agree with whole-heartedly.

Could you give a quick list of points you agree with, point you disagree with? Or a long post, haha, you sound successful in the game. His strongest point was the baking analogy in my opinion. Absolutely great way to state that, best way I've seen it conveyed. Obviously reinforcing a strong frame and value is important as well, but everyone on this site should be familiar with that at this point.

Basically, as he stated you shouldn't answer too soon of course, there are no set rules sometimes you can answer right away. But more importantly you can't wait too long like he said more than a day. When I first started, waiting too long was my biggest mistake. Because there are so many people messaging them, if you don't respond and they aren't seeing your photo pop up inevitably they will just move on to the next guy talking to them. Only exception to this is if you have their number then you can wait a while to text them.

Even still I usually give them a heads up when I know I'm too busy to schedule a date for a couple weeks though. I don't agree with making girls think you flaked. Or being deliberately vague on what you will be doing. Not that those things don't work, I just don't find them necessary. Getting them to do this shouldn't require many tricks. I actually think the hardest part of online dating isn't the 1st date, it is the 2nd assuming you didn't hook up on 1 and want a 2.

The baking principle still applies generally I find that if you need to set the 2nd date within 3 days of the 1st date while the girl is still giddy about you.

This is obviously VERY hard to do if you have a busy or non-static work schedule. The longer you let things sit, the less she will remember about you and the harder it will be to drag her out again, and once you start spending time trying to drag her out you start down the inevitable path of lowering your value. This is also true if you slept together on the first date usually. I don't agree with deliberately dropping convoys or even having them, even if they are nondescript.

Ideally you aren't having more than one conversation before you ask for drinks. I'm trying to get a number set a day to get drinks and let our first convos be on the date itself. If you don't get a number the first time you ask, they will usually carry the conversation forward. Then after they respond I ask again.

I've not had anyone not give it the 2nd time. My advice goes mainly for Tinder, I think most other dating tools now are inferior. The quality of girls on Tinder is much better, and you can get numbers much faster. The others require more effort with less results in other words, there is no point to using anything but Tinder. You have to feel out the girl, but the best night to go out on dates in my opinion is Friday, no obligations for either generally and if things are going well you can continually progress them forward whereas weekdays are more restrictive.

Weekdays are better for girls you aren't completely sure about, have more boring looking pictures, or you think might be more timid. Ask for the number quickly, and do it in the context of getting drinks soon the less you talk about the more exciting it is for both YOU and her on the first date. That doesn't mean don't screen them what they are doing in their pictures and what they write in their about section are actually useful for this purpose. Also, if girls don't use good punctuation that is a red flag to me that they are stupid.

One thing I do to "bake" at the right rate is to check my phone when I'm at the gym in the morning, and once at night after work. Since I work out at 5am in the morning, that usually also adds some intrigue as to why the hell you are up that early. Also if they ask why I'm only responding at those times I tell them I only use Tinder between sets while I'm working out our while I'm on public transit. Of course, there are always exceptions you should never be following set rules but doing whatever you feel is right for the situation.

None of these things are necessary and really everyone will just find out what things work for them with practice. I'd say your online approach is very similiar to mine and you concerns with my some of my approaches are sound.

I believe it comes down to a matter of personality; the way I approach fits my personality and I've tailored this guide to fit the common denominator of RPers. Small changes for sake of personal accomodation are bound to happen.

It's to convey a sense of under-investment regarding your interaction with her. She's not important enough to you to illicit long, grammatically correct messages or immediate responses. I don't know that it generates intrigue. It definitely generates a sense of "This person is a dumbass," though. Goes for both sexes. I suppose it's different if you're ONLY looking to bang chicks.

But if you expect to spend any amount of time bonding with people, I'd much rather do it with people who know the difference between a hammer and a nail. And why do you assume she's basing whether or not you're worth sleeping with solely on your grammical prowess? Grammatical accuracy is something men harp on about because men communicate through facts and facts require an accurate interpretation, leading towards the frustration involved in misinterpretations caused by poor grammar.

Women DO NOT communicate this way. Women communicate through body language and intention. The minimalistic grammatical approach I'm suggesting translates an intention of under-investment. If a woman says she won't sleep with you because you left out the apostrophe in "what're" or in "don't", it's either shit test or you have deeper issues at play. If its on the basis of some grammatical morality, I'd argue that weighing grammatical perfection over sex doesn't reflect positively on your priorities.

This may be heresy around here, but sex isn't the only goal. Especially if you're titling the article "online dating" and not "online hookups. Dating implies a relationship. Hookups obviously imply fucking. If you're looking for bitches to fuck, yeah, obviously go for the best looking vapid cunts that will fuck you. If you're looking for a relationship though, well, I guess it's no surprise this subreddit exists if what you're looking for in a relationship is a vapid cunt.

According to your notion, "sleeping with" someone should only involve sleep. I haven't ever downvoted someone for disagreeing with me.

Quite the opposite; I welcome discussions different than my own. I downvote comments that are either baseless, unnecessary, overly-biased or fail to add to the conversation at hand. I don't normally quote myself outside of my post, but I feel this is an accurate answer in this case. All I know is that in digital media it's almost always neckbeards that are sticklers for grammar, and I have no idea why you'd want to throw yourself in with that crowd.

Is grammar probably good? But the neckbeards ruined it for everyone. Man this is tight I have been implemeting this the past few days with my tinder matches, and hell its really useful to weed out quickly non interested girls. TRP has shocked me with how little time and energy I can invest in a woman and still get laid. Your last guide put that at an all-time maximum effeciency. This guide looks like it'll cut my time investment further. Thanks, OmLaLa. Your guides are doing the world a service, on several different levels.

You call all those hours of gym and eating "little"? And the rest of the day to make you a more interesting man? Ah, I enjoy the gym and my hobbies. It's the talking to new prospects that's usually a chore. I don't really do "dates" it's f-close after meet up or I don't talk to her again. Does this work for you? I want to do the same thing but have been having trouble becoming adept at making sure I'm not perceived as trying to "date" them.

Then don't date them. Keep it as casual as possible. Meet her someplace free, or a place you were already going, invite her to your place afterwords, get in her pants, and kick her out. If she gets lovey-dovey, tell her you noticed and you're not the boyfriend type.

I usually don't even have to say that much. Girls know their place. It's when you start treating them like they're special when they expect to be treated better than other people. Is this your MO? I'm assuming with your conviction this works well for you consistently.

Is this correct? I think there's something about them giving it up so early that just makes them "along for the ride" and they just don't cause any problems and we don't talk about what this is.

Unfortunately, this "don't ask; don't tell" seems like a good way to get involved with women living with a dude. I had three turn out to be married, two were engaged, and I think one of my plates now at least has a boyfriend some bodies taking her out to fancy restaurants and she keeps puting pics on instagram.

I don't have any gripes with fucking taken women, but, I dunno when RP truth is so clear and in your face it's a lot to take in. All the women there have a very good reason that they need to online date.

They're fat or ugly or single moms or insane or boring or lazy or sluts or gold diggers or even dangerous. Pick a few traits and add way too high expectations and you have your typical online dating woman. Most of them are just fat and boring btw, they could easily get a man by losing pounds and going outside.

Tinder is something different as it's Chad's personal booty call app and not really a dating app. Tinder is the only one I bother with anymore. I think the social stigma against online dating is much less with Tinder. I've seen way more attractive girls there. I think it's because they can only receive messages from guys they like and match with instead of weeding through hundreds. The fact that it's just an app on your phone with little investment as well.

As you get older the usefulness of online dating drops precipitously. After 37 the chances of you pulling age group girls are going to be much lower. Just having that number there is enough to make them go eeewww creepy. I have zero problems getting the same age group to show interest in person, but online all I get is wrinkled up hags and fat single mothers. They don't want to know, they want to assume you're just prematurely gray.

Unless I want to fuck a 45 year old single mom with a mustache, online dating is absolutely useless. If you're not looking for relationships and just to hook up, then lower your age so long as you can look the part in person. Gray hair and I'm obviously not 30 anymore. Five years ago I could pull off 30, but no longer at All I do is fuck buddies and short term, I have no use for an LTR.

No bitch will ever hear me tell her I love her or anything close to it. I'm in my early 30s but am constantly told I look mids. I set my online stuff to "30" because a lot of girls under 25 will set 30 as their highest age limit. Definitely for me. You hit 40 and the 20 somethings look at you as either a creepy old guy or bb. In person, whole different world. While I always love seeing Bonecrcker brought up, I must disagree with you here. That was written before Online dating has changed tremendously.

Normal people use it too now. Tinder happened. Social stigma went. But online dating isn't a non-starter, and it has a lot of uses. This is great. Been looking around for a Tinder post for awhile now that covered almost every aspect. This is perfect.

Thanks man. For shirt less pics, do you have to have chiseled abs? While I have muscle I have some body fat so you can see the abs are there, you just don't see the six pack very well. That and having your forearm musculature clearly showing. It sounds retarded, I know, but it's something more than a handful of women have commented on. Saving this and will come back to it when i have improved myself enough.

Just started lifting and working on myself thanks to this subreddit otherwise I'd still be watching porn and fapping away my chances of getting laid. OmLaLa makes the best guides EVER, very practical writings. I'll get back to using Tinder as I'm working too much and can't to go out 3x a week.

Feeling confident with my new knowledge. That is the ideal daygame scenario: becoming a naturally social and flirty person. But on that note, I think daygame is something everyone should try at least a few times, especially while they're young. If you're out getting dates, you'll have a number of flaked meetups.

The way to counter this is to double or even triple-book. Yes, this means you'll have to flake on them. Give about 1 hour intervals on your date meetup times.

You can tell within a half hour whether a date is promising. If date 1 is definitely going good and I mean, you're about to make out , then excuse yourself to the bathroom and tell date 2 something came up and you want to reschedule for another time. If date 1 is neutral, say you have to leave, go on to date 2.

Let's say date 2 stands you up, no problem, you still have date 3. If date 3 flakes, that's okay, just call up a pal around the corner and start picking up more women in the vicinity. Rinse, repeat. If you consistently do this at least a couple times a week, your abundance will build up to a crescendo. Yes, this might piss off your other dates but that's the reality of the game.

Hey shitlords I am going on a tinder date. I have done okc and pof on several occasions. Will report back at some point in the week. Having multiple girls tell me they are looking for hot dirty sex. Please advise, instructions unclear. Dick stuck in fan. I'm glad to hear it. All I want is for TRP to experience the same amount of successes I have online. I hooked up with girls over summer from Tinder.

I agree with everything you said except the opener of "hi". If you can come up with something clever that'll always be the better than "hi". I tell them, "I'm going to grab lunch at whatever at 1pm. Come with me". I tell them.

I never ask them anything. If they can't make it then I don't reply back. I'll try again in a few days. Note: Before you start telling them make sure your SMV is there. Otherwise, like OP said they won't like it. If your SMV is there then BE A FUCKING LION with these women! Don't be scared of it going south. Abundance mentality my friends. One more thing: after I get the number.

I text them "Hey it's Grifter. Save my number. You're going to need it". They love that. It's never failed me. loving how you always revise these dating guides OmLaLa. Since I'm feeling a bit more confident with my smv now I'm going in.

That's the one. Although it caters to exes, the approach should be similar if I'm not mistaken. hah, I hopped on eHarmony for a weekend and apparently they have an option to limit the minimum of words they receive. Chicks can be like, "nuhuh, you gotta say at least words to get MY attention! Makes a lot of sense. Thank you for sharing your experience. Quick question. What do you do then? My opener has always been just their name. It has garnered a huge response rate.

Response is nothing without effective under-investment control. I wouldn't send their name as an initial message as it's tailored to that particular LSSW. I see those all the time and still get to a close of some sort.

If is says things like "don't message me hi" or "not looking for just a hook-up", it's a message directed at men she considers of lower value than herself. If it says things like "message me" or "inbox me" or "stop looking you've found me" it's meant for men above her perceived SMV.

Her response or lack thereof will tell you what she considers you, so it's a good way to gauge your perceived SMV amongst LSSW of a similar SMV when compared to hers. If she says "don't just say hi", you just say hi and she responds, phiscally she considers you more attractive than her. If she doesn't respond, she considers you just as attract women don't fuck down or parallel or less attractive than her.

Do you always just say K? Or do you engage as well? I just had a girl say I was a Leo, her favorite sign. I was thinking to reply with Yeah, We have a reputation. Or should I just K it? I would think just K would cause disinterest.

Continuing on tangents like this will likely lead to becoming a source of validation instead of a sexual one. Here's how it'd possibly play out and you may have already had this happen before : the conversation concludes, you ask for her number and since she's been validated through your light convo on astrology, she'll only look for more of the same.

Remember, you don't exist to her as a person until you've actually met. Until then, you're nothing more than another "feel-good" stimuli source no matter how attractive you may be. Since sex isn't possible with an imaginary friend, she'll stick to what you were just good for moments ago: a source of validation.

She might then disregard your request for her number or your request to meet in person as meeting a validationary source in person is unnecessary. Though you can't see it from a male's bio, there are TONS -literally TONS- of guys on dating sites pouring validation like this onto these girls on a daily basis.

She feels ugly because she stood by some sexy girl at the gym the past two hours? Better check my dating profile and read through the hundreds of messages from guys who love me as I am. I know this guide is already really comprehensive but I am missing one point after the "you free this week". When she says "yes" or "yes, thursday" and doesn't ask what will you be doing or where to meet, how to best continue? I always felt like displaying dominance by saying "ok, meet me by XXX at 8" is the best way but you kinda make it sound you have better ways please advice.

I think "ok, meet me by XXX at 8" is an appropriate response, sans the "ok," at the beginning and change the "by" to "at". Personally, I'd leave grammar completely absent are reply with "[address] [time of meet]". Remember, the shorter the better. Some of this guide conflicts drastically with my experiences. Example, opening with "Hi" has never gotten a response, ever.

Then again, I don't have a shirtless pic, or anything high SMV either. I suspect if you're successful with that profile pic you can open with anything "boring" and atill get a positive any response. That's not necessarily true. Positive maybe, but a highly invested message and an attractive photo leads them to label you as "boyfriend material". That is what we're actively aiming to avoid. I was and still am struggling with online sites, so I tested AF profiles.

Basically I found that you have to trigger sexual arousal somehow, and if people are on a forum to discuss sexual strategy, it's likely not going to be their looks that does it. The profile pics that were linked in the original post show this.

The unsuccessful ones are just slightly "off". Yet it's clear there's no sexual attraction. All im saying is if the profile pic won't give her tingles, "hi" sure as hell won't help. I say, don't reward that behavior. If you are writing in sentences and she is sending back one word, sure she is interested but she will be a huge pain in the butt and probably not worth dating.

If this happens, NEXT her. Three years ago I screwed two new women a week for about six months and got most of them online. I learned a lot from it. My biggest problem with tinder is the messaging. I just don't know how to keep the ball movin, most girls in my country want to have a week long chat before anything yet talking to them is like throwing ball with a wall.

As long as the peices are small! That was some minutes ago so we'll see if I get a response. I guess the main thing I'm lacking, and would require advice on, is how to bring the chat from hi how are you and worthless small talk to an actual date.

Damn, give this man a medal! Not gonna lie first time I read this, I called it BS. Specially considering these lines sound extremely awkward in portuguese my language and contradict a lot of RP wisdom. Boy, was I wrong It's bloody crazy how I can see them gushing their panties over the tubes. AWALT and AWALTE, I guess. Only part I disagree is about ugly girls. They're what I call fodder: worthy for practice and experimenting new lines, as well as distracting from the good ones, so you don't overgive them attention and better "bake" them, as OP says.

Noticed you go to raves too. Been going almost every month for almost three years and I have never seen a single cold-approach at a rave work. I usually bring my own women BYOW and basically use the rave as a date. I've been having moderate success closing but could use tips to increase my chances of you have any. Lol, This "what you looking for" line gives margin to the most hilarious replies. Some so far include "someone. new message to pay me a pizza" and "not nemo".

Mostly they just answer "don't really know, you? Regular tinderer, decided to try "Hi" followed by "What are you looking for? Just laugh it off, mate. Seems like you saved yourself from a bloody self-conceited bitch there. That sums up online dating IMO. Seriously, though, if it works for you, more power to you. I've found more effective routes to get what I want.

Online dating doesn't provide enough reward for effort to be worth my time. I'd argue that this approach takes a very minute amount of effort all things considered. But to each his own. Online dating is great for guys with low standards. HBs don't need anymore validation and already have many options from RL. Validation isn't like hunger; it isn't just sated and then they're satified for a few months.

Women always crave a better source. In addition the fact that online dating is catered to women many "premium" features a woman's profile starts out with leads to why the process of browsing online dating sites is so easy for them.

Why wouldn't they at least join one to see if there's someone better than the Chad they're currently sleeping with? If you're only surrounded by HB4 and want to fuck an HB8, it makes sense. If you're surrounded by HB7s and you want to fuck HB9s, it makes sense. It's not that these hot women aren't being validated enough, they just want more. They want better. I think it depends on where you live.

My town has about k people and I found no quality on okcupid that wasn't fake. Tinder is much better. I've had a couple tinder matches that never responded to me on okcupid HB and there are many more s which are nonexistent on cupid. Tons of spambots though.

OKCupid on the other hand is loaded with attactive women, many of whom are joining a recent polyamory movement. Online dating gives the illusion of having a lot of opportunities.

All those matches with hot chicks gives us hope that she's actually someone we "got. But it's an illusion of abundance. She's just pixels on a screen. Most of them just want validation. You might not even meet her. A good number of women join these sites because they just got dumped by their alpha ex, and need a quick boost of validation.

She'll do it for a month, then quit her account. That's not a the best dating pool to work in. That's why there are so many unexplained soft nexts on these dating apps. In fact, the loss of productivity at work or during projects while you answer texts from women takes time out of your day.

At least in person, you know you'll just be doing it during happy hour, which is a designated time to let loose and not deal with work. The advantage of meeting women in person is that you immediately know how it's going and are automatically a notch higher in SMV because you're right there, in-the-flesh, and she doesn't have to be embarrassed that she met you online -- which only a few short years ago was considered "nerdy. Sometimes, you may even gain a good male friend and wingmang in the process.

You can't get that hunched over a phone in a dark room. The only advantage online dating has vs real life is if your real-life approach skills are abysmal.

But what I found is, when you can do it in real life really well, you will meet women far better than any you can meet online. Intentional day game requires travel to a locale and approaching 1 girl at a time with mixed results and across a long amount of time.

Effective online dating sites allows me to approach upwards of 50 women at once, allows more elements of the encounters to be controlled i. what she see vs. Just this week I've attained 3 plates from POF and 1 plate from Tinder without ever having to go out on a date or leave my apartment. We message, we text, I invite them over, we have sex, they come back a couple days later.

On terms of ease it's like ordering a pizza every day vs. driving to the pizzeria daily and waiting. Sending girls one word responses is the brunt of communication involved in this online dating approach.

While the guide is long, the process itself is very simple and convenient. Going out to a bar or club is not. You're still the victim of extraneous circumstances outside of your control which drastically effect your likelihood of success. She could be having a bad day.

Her father could've just died. ASD could be in overdrive as her friends are present. She could've come with her boyfriend. There are women in relationship abound in clubs. At least with online dating, she's more likely to choose to get on the site when she's in a good mood and open to the possibility of meeting someone.

If she's on a dating site, you already know that she's openly identifying as single without needlessly putting up a facade as she might do in a club ASD, around friends, came with another guy, etc. It removes a lot of guesswork.

The advantage of meeting women in person is that you immediately know how it's going and are automatically a notch higher in SMV because you're right there, in-the-flesh, and she doesn't have to be embarrassed that she met you online. Women aren't inherently ashamed about meeting a guy online, especially if he's attractive.

And if they are, they'll just lie. Hell, Fine China and I met off of Tinder and we've told people we met in a bookstore for months. The story gets more and more convoluted every time she tells it. So long as we're having sex, what she tells other people doesn't matter in the slightest.

I personally find it hilarious. No to nitpick, but there have been a lot changes in "a few short years", yet the concept of online dating has always been prevalent. A "few short years" ago, Myspace was the only true dominant social media site.

And yet, even on Myspace, people met and fucked all the time. The only difference between then and now is that sites like Tinder and POF are solely dedicated to that interaction, while sites like Myspace and Facebook remain multifaceted. Not if, but when she ask you about the past girl you where TALKING TO just tell her that the lady girl was boring. She will get very insecure and try harder.

Happened to me last night. I got asked almost immediately how many girls I've met so far. Told her I don't keep track but they were pretty boring. An hour later she was in my bed moaning. Another tip: tell her something brutally honest you don't like about girls, bbbuuutttt make sure she doesn't have it.

I tell girls im very particular about nipples. I hate big nipples, they will send nudes very soon after. How many girls will actually respond to "K"? This is a good guide overall, I just feel like many won't bother responding to a one word answer like that, especially when they presumably are getting hundreds of other messages. When your SMV is a margin above hers, and you're making it clear you know that, why wouldn't she respond? Yours will be different even if it's a single letter. Yet I'm pretty sure the majority are "hey" to start.

It's even in their profile. If the responds it's a sure date. If she doesn't next her. I like to give those responses at one point to weed out the flakes. I've followed your previous post's advice with great results so this is not a critique but more of clarifying questions.

To me it seems like you're placating to the times she is available. Same goes for "whenever" when being ask to meet up. To me this seems like it goes against the whole men are in control and women want to be led idea. Wouldn't it be more manly to dictate time and place?

Responding with something like "X time at X location. This seems to be against the consensus in most RP materials. Outright saying your wants is successful, or at least has been for me. I guess I'm just interested in a discussion of how and why this has been successful for you since it does not seem to be the norm.

I think the main point here is being different, and in this day and age, being different means showing you don't really give a shit. As for 3, one point of distinction is texting before she considers us a real person versus when she has met us and knows we exist. The vagueness and flakiness is perhaps better for the former in order to spin the hamster wheel and force her to think about us as real people and wonder what we're thinking about.

I'm just interested in a discussion of how and why this has been successful for you since it does not seem to be the norm. I read the original LSSW series that OP wrote and I was struck by how much of the details but not the big picture seemed to contradict things I understand about TRP.

Some of his convos went something like:. him: "what are you looking for? And you? Do you want to hang out and be friends? Saw an RSD video about "let's meet up as friends. Online dating is a great teaching tool for guys who still struggle with putting women on a pedastel. Read those profiles, and you will quickly learn how boring and fucking basic the majority of them are.

You realize quickly just how more interesting you are compared to them. It helps you realize that girls are really looking for an interesting guy so they can join in on the activities. RSD Tyler puts it as 'a man is an island with a strong grounded reality. A woman is a boat with no reality and she goes from island to island experiencing different realities.

But she has no reality of her own. That tidbit is actually striking me much harder than any TRP theory short of the misandry bubble. I have a very good amount of success with online dating, getting more dates per week than I can actually go on. That said, I don't agree with many of these statements, though I do see the logic and reasoning in them. Many of them I also agree with whole-heartedly. Could you give a quick list of points you agree with, point you disagree with?

Or a long post, haha, you sound successful in the game. His strongest point was the baking analogy in my opinion. Absolutely great way to state that, best way I've seen it conveyed.

Obviously reinforcing a strong frame and value is important as well, but everyone on this site should be familiar with that at this point. Basically, as he stated you shouldn't answer too soon of course, there are no set rules sometimes you can answer right away. But more importantly you can't wait too long like he said more than a day. When I first started, waiting too long was my biggest mistake. Because there are so many people messaging them, if you don't respond and they aren't seeing your photo pop up inevitably they will just move on to the next guy talking to them.

Only exception to this is if you have their number then you can wait a while to text them. Even still I usually give them a heads up when I know I'm too busy to schedule a date for a couple weeks though. I don't agree with making girls think you flaked. Or being deliberately vague on what you will be doing. Not that those things don't work, I just don't find them necessary. Getting them to do this shouldn't require many tricks.

I actually think the hardest part of online dating isn't the 1st date, it is the 2nd assuming you didn't hook up on 1 and want a 2. The baking principle still applies generally I find that if you need to set the 2nd date within 3 days of the 1st date while the girl is still giddy about you. This is obviously VERY hard to do if you have a busy or non-static work schedule. The longer you let things sit, the less she will remember about you and the harder it will be to drag her out again, and once you start spending time trying to drag her out you start down the inevitable path of lowering your value.

This is also true if you slept together on the first date usually. I don't agree with deliberately dropping convoys or even having them, even if they are nondescript.

Ideally you aren't having more than one conversation before you ask for drinks. I'm trying to get a number set a day to get drinks and let our first convos be on the date itself. If you don't get a number the first time you ask, they will usually carry the conversation forward. Then after they respond I ask again. I've not had anyone not give it the 2nd time. My advice goes mainly for Tinder, I think most other dating tools now are inferior.

The quality of girls on Tinder is much better, and you can get numbers much faster. The others require more effort with less results in other words, there is no point to using anything but Tinder. You have to feel out the girl, but the best night to go out on dates in my opinion is Friday, no obligations for either generally and if things are going well you can continually progress them forward whereas weekdays are more restrictive.

Weekdays are better for girls you aren't completely sure about, have more boring looking pictures, or you think might be more timid. Ask for the number quickly, and do it in the context of getting drinks soon the less you talk about the more exciting it is for both YOU and her on the first date.

That doesn't mean don't screen them what they are doing in their pictures and what they write in their about section are actually useful for this purpose. Also, if girls don't use good punctuation that is a red flag to me that they are stupid. One thing I do to "bake" at the right rate is to check my phone when I'm at the gym in the morning, and once at night after work.

Since I work out at 5am in the morning, that usually also adds some intrigue as to why the hell you are up that early. Also if they ask why I'm only responding at those times I tell them I only use Tinder between sets while I'm working out our while I'm on public transit.

Of course, there are always exceptions you should never be following set rules but doing whatever you feel is right for the situation. None of these things are necessary and really everyone will just find out what things work for them with practice. I'd say your online approach is very similiar to mine and you concerns with my some of my approaches are sound. I believe it comes down to a matter of personality; the way I approach fits my personality and I've tailored this guide to fit the common denominator of RPers.

Small changes for sake of personal accomodation are bound to happen. It's to convey a sense of under-investment regarding your interaction with her.

She's not important enough to you to illicit long, grammatically correct messages or immediate responses. I don't know that it generates intrigue. It definitely generates a sense of "This person is a dumbass," though. Goes for both sexes. I suppose it's different if you're ONLY looking to bang chicks.

But if you expect to spend any amount of time bonding with people, I'd much rather do it with people who know the difference between a hammer and a nail.

And why do you assume she's basing whether or not you're worth sleeping with solely on your grammical prowess? Grammatical accuracy is something men harp on about because men communicate through facts and facts require an accurate interpretation, leading towards the frustration involved in misinterpretations caused by poor grammar.

Women DO NOT communicate this way. Women communicate through body language and intention. The minimalistic grammatical approach I'm suggesting translates an intention of under-investment.

If a woman says she won't sleep with you because you left out the apostrophe in "what're" or in "don't", it's either shit test or you have deeper issues at play. If its on the basis of some grammatical morality, I'd argue that weighing grammatical perfection over sex doesn't reflect positively on your priorities. This may be heresy around here, but sex isn't the only goal. Especially if you're titling the article "online dating" and not "online hookups.

Dating implies a relationship. Hookups obviously imply fucking. If you're looking for bitches to fuck, yeah, obviously go for the best looking vapid cunts that will fuck you. If you're looking for a relationship though, well, I guess it's no surprise this subreddit exists if what you're looking for in a relationship is a vapid cunt.

According to your notion, "sleeping with" someone should only involve sleep. I haven't ever downvoted someone for disagreeing with me. Quite the opposite; I welcome discussions different than my own. I downvote comments that are either baseless, unnecessary, overly-biased or fail to add to the conversation at hand. I don't normally quote myself outside of my post, but I feel this is an accurate answer in this case.

All I know is that in digital media it's almost always neckbeards that are sticklers for grammar, and I have no idea why you'd want to throw yourself in with that crowd.

Is grammar probably good? But the neckbeards ruined it for everyone. Man this is tight I have been implemeting this the past few days with my tinder matches, and hell its really useful to weed out quickly non interested girls.

TRP has shocked me with how little time and energy I can invest in a woman and still get laid. Your last guide put that at an all-time maximum effeciency. This guide looks like it'll cut my time investment further. Thanks, OmLaLa. Your guides are doing the world a service, on several different levels. You call all those hours of gym and eating "little"? And the rest of the day to make you a more interesting man? Ah, I enjoy the gym and my hobbies. It's the talking to new prospects that's usually a chore.

I don't really do "dates" it's f-close after meet up or I don't talk to her again. Does this work for you? I want to do the same thing but have been having trouble becoming adept at making sure I'm not perceived as trying to "date" them.

Then don't date them. Keep it as casual as possible. Meet her someplace free, or a place you were already going, invite her to your place afterwords, get in her pants, and kick her out. If she gets lovey-dovey, tell her you noticed and you're not the boyfriend type. I usually don't even have to say that much. Girls know their place. It's when you start treating them like they're special when they expect to be treated better than other people. Is this your MO? I'm assuming with your conviction this works well for you consistently.

Is this correct? I think there's something about them giving it up so early that just makes them "along for the ride" and they just don't cause any problems and we don't talk about what this is. Unfortunately, this "don't ask; don't tell" seems like a good way to get involved with women living with a dude.

I had three turn out to be married, two were engaged, and I think one of my plates now at least has a boyfriend some bodies taking her out to fancy restaurants and she keeps puting pics on instagram. I don't have any gripes with fucking taken women, but, I dunno when RP truth is so clear and in your face it's a lot to take in. All the women there have a very good reason that they need to online date.

They're fat or ugly or single moms or insane or boring or lazy or sluts or gold diggers or even dangerous. Pick a few traits and add way too high expectations and you have your typical online dating woman. Most of them are just fat and boring btw, they could easily get a man by losing pounds and going outside.

Tinder is something different as it's Chad's personal booty call app and not really a dating app. Tinder is the only one I bother with anymore. I think the social stigma against online dating is much less with Tinder. I've seen way more attractive girls there. I think it's because they can only receive messages from guys they like and match with instead of weeding through hundreds.

The fact that it's just an app on your phone with little investment as well. As you get older the usefulness of online dating drops precipitously. After 37 the chances of you pulling age group girls are going to be much lower. Just having that number there is enough to make them go eeewww creepy.

I have zero problems getting the same age group to show interest in person, but online all I get is wrinkled up hags and fat single mothers. They don't want to know, they want to assume you're just prematurely gray. Unless I want to fuck a 45 year old single mom with a mustache, online dating is absolutely useless. If you're not looking for relationships and just to hook up, then lower your age so long as you can look the part in person.

Gray hair and I'm obviously not 30 anymore. Five years ago I could pull off 30, but no longer at All I do is fuck buddies and short term, I have no use for an LTR. No bitch will ever hear me tell her I love her or anything close to it. I'm in my early 30s but am constantly told I look mids. I set my online stuff to "30" because a lot of girls under 25 will set 30 as their highest age limit. Definitely for me. You hit 40 and the 20 somethings look at you as either a creepy old guy or bb.

In person, whole different world. While I always love seeing Bonecrcker brought up, I must disagree with you here. That was written before Online dating has changed tremendously. Normal people use it too now. Tinder happened. Social stigma went. But online dating isn't a non-starter, and it has a lot of uses. This is great. Been looking around for a Tinder post for awhile now that covered almost every aspect. This is perfect. Thanks man. For shirt less pics, do you have to have chiseled abs?

While I have muscle I have some body fat so you can see the abs are there, you just don't see the six pack very well.

That and having your forearm musculature clearly showing. It sounds retarded, I know, but it's something more than a handful of women have commented on.

Saving this and will come back to it when i have improved myself enough. Just started lifting and working on myself thanks to this subreddit otherwise I'd still be watching porn and fapping away my chances of getting laid.

OmLaLa makes the best guides EVER, very practical writings. I'll get back to using Tinder as I'm working too much and can't to go out 3x a week. Feeling confident with my new knowledge. That is the ideal daygame scenario: becoming a naturally social and flirty person. But on that note, I think daygame is something everyone should try at least a few times, especially while they're young.

If you're out getting dates, you'll have a number of flaked meetups. The way to counter this is to double or even triple-book. Yes, this means you'll have to flake on them. Give about 1 hour intervals on your date meetup times. You can tell within a half hour whether a date is promising. If date 1 is definitely going good and I mean, you're about to make out , then excuse yourself to the bathroom and tell date 2 something came up and you want to reschedule for another time.

If date 1 is neutral, say you have to leave, go on to date 2. Let's say date 2 stands you up, no problem, you still have date 3. If date 3 flakes, that's okay, just call up a pal around the corner and start picking up more women in the vicinity.

Rinse, repeat. If you consistently do this at least a couple times a week, your abundance will build up to a crescendo. Yes, this might piss off your other dates but that's the reality of the game. Hey shitlords I am going on a tinder date.

I have done okc and pof on several occasions. Will report back at some point in the week. Having multiple girls tell me they are looking for hot dirty sex. Please advise, instructions unclear. Dick stuck in fan. I'm glad to hear it. All I want is for TRP to experience the same amount of successes I have online. I hooked up with girls over summer from Tinder.

I agree with everything you said except the opener of "hi". If you can come up with something clever that'll always be the better than "hi". I tell them, "I'm going to grab lunch at whatever at 1pm. Come with me". I tell them. I never ask them anything. If they can't make it then I don't reply back. I'll try again in a few days. Note: Before you start telling them make sure your SMV is there.

Otherwise, like OP said they won't like it. If your SMV is there then BE A FUCKING LION with these women! Don't be scared of it going south.

Abundance mentality my friends. One more thing: after I get the number. I text them "Hey it's Grifter. Save my number. You're going to need it". They love that. It's never failed me. loving how you always revise these dating guides OmLaLa. Since I'm feeling a bit more confident with my smv now I'm going in. That's the one. Although it caters to exes, the approach should be similar if I'm not mistaken. hah, I hopped on eHarmony for a weekend and apparently they have an option to limit the minimum of words they receive.

Chicks can be like, "nuhuh, you gotta say at least words to get MY attention! Makes a lot of sense. Thank you for sharing your experience.

Quick question. What do you do then? My opener has always been just their name. It has garnered a huge response rate. Response is nothing without effective under-investment control. I wouldn't send their name as an initial message as it's tailored to that particular LSSW. I see those all the time and still get to a close of some sort. If is says things like "don't message me hi" or "not looking for just a hook-up", it's a message directed at men she considers of lower value than herself.

If it says things like "message me" or "inbox me" or "stop looking you've found me" it's meant for men above her perceived SMV. Her response or lack thereof will tell you what she considers you, so it's a good way to gauge your perceived SMV amongst LSSW of a similar SMV when compared to hers.

If she says "don't just say hi", you just say hi and she responds, phiscally she considers you more attractive than her. If she doesn't respond, she considers you just as attract women don't fuck down or parallel or less attractive than her. Do you always just say K? Or do you engage as well? I just had a girl say I was a Leo, her favorite sign.

I was thinking to reply with Yeah, We have a reputation. Or should I just K it? I would think just K would cause disinterest. Continuing on tangents like this will likely lead to becoming a source of validation instead of a sexual one.

Here's how it'd possibly play out and you may have already had this happen before : the conversation concludes, you ask for her number and since she's been validated through your light convo on astrology, she'll only look for more of the same.

Remember, you don't exist to her as a person until you've actually met. Until then, you're nothing more than another "feel-good" stimuli source no matter how attractive you may be. Since sex isn't possible with an imaginary friend, she'll stick to what you were just good for moments ago: a source of validation.

She might then disregard your request for her number or your request to meet in person as meeting a validationary source in person is unnecessary. Though you can't see it from a male's bio, there are TONS -literally TONS- of guys on dating sites pouring validation like this onto these girls on a daily basis. She feels ugly because she stood by some sexy girl at the gym the past two hours? Better check my dating profile and read through the hundreds of messages from guys who love me as I am.

I know this guide is already really comprehensive but I am missing one point after the "you free this week". When she says "yes" or "yes, thursday" and doesn't ask what will you be doing or where to meet, how to best continue? I always felt like displaying dominance by saying "ok, meet me by XXX at 8" is the best way but you kinda make it sound you have better ways please advice. I think "ok, meet me by XXX at 8" is an appropriate response, sans the "ok," at the beginning and change the "by" to "at".

Personally, I'd leave grammar completely absent are reply with "[address] [time of meet]". Remember, the shorter the better. Some of this guide conflicts drastically with my experiences. Example, opening with "Hi" has never gotten a response, ever. Then again, I don't have a shirtless pic, or anything high SMV either. I suspect if you're successful with that profile pic you can open with anything "boring" and atill get a positive any response. That's not necessarily true.

Positive maybe, but a highly invested message and an attractive photo leads them to label you as "boyfriend material". That is what we're actively aiming to avoid. I was and still am struggling with online sites, so I tested AF profiles. Basically I found that you have to trigger sexual arousal somehow, and if people are on a forum to discuss sexual strategy, it's likely not going to be their looks that does it.

The profile pics that were linked in the original post show this. The unsuccessful ones are just slightly "off". Yet it's clear there's no sexual attraction. All im saying is if the profile pic won't give her tingles, "hi" sure as hell won't help. I say, don't reward that behavior. If you are writing in sentences and she is sending back one word, sure she is interested but she will be a huge pain in the butt and probably not worth dating.

If this happens, NEXT her. Three years ago I screwed two new women a week for about six months and got most of them online. I learned a lot from it.

My biggest problem with tinder is the messaging. I just don't know how to keep the ball movin, most girls in my country want to have a week long chat before anything yet talking to them is like throwing ball with a wall. As long as the peices are small! That was some minutes ago so we'll see if I get a response. I guess the main thing I'm lacking, and would require advice on, is how to bring the chat from hi how are you and worthless small talk to an actual date.

Damn, give this man a medal! Not gonna lie first time I read this, I called it BS. Specially considering these lines sound extremely awkward in portuguese my language and contradict a lot of RP wisdom. Boy, was I wrong It's bloody crazy how I can see them gushing their panties over the tubes. AWALT and AWALTE, I guess. Only part I disagree is about ugly girls. They're what I call fodder: worthy for practice and experimenting new lines, as well as distracting from the good ones, so you don't overgive them attention and better "bake" them, as OP says.

Noticed you go to raves too. Been going almost every month for almost three years and I have never seen a single cold-approach at a rave work. I usually bring my own women BYOW and basically use the rave as a date. I've been having moderate success closing but could use tips to increase my chances of you have any.

Lol, This "what you looking for" line gives margin to the most hilarious replies. Some so far include "someone. new message to pay me a pizza" and "not nemo". Mostly they just answer "don't really know, you? Regular tinderer, decided to try "Hi" followed by "What are you looking for?

Just laugh it off, mate. Seems like you saved yourself from a bloody self-conceited bitch there. That sums up online dating IMO. Seriously, though, if it works for you, more power to you. I've found more effective routes to get what I want.

Online dating doesn't provide enough reward for effort to be worth my time. I'd argue that this approach takes a very minute amount of effort all things considered. But to each his own. Online dating is great for guys with low standards. HBs don't need anymore validation and already have many options from RL. Validation isn't like hunger; it isn't just sated and then they're satified for a few months. Women always crave a better source. In addition the fact that online dating is catered to women many "premium" features a woman's profile starts out with leads to why the process of browsing online dating sites is so easy for them.

Why wouldn't they at least join one to see if there's someone better than the Chad they're currently sleeping with?

If you're only surrounded by HB4 and want to fuck an HB8, it makes sense. If you're surrounded by HB7s and you want to fuck HB9s, it makes sense. It's not that these hot women aren't being validated enough, they just want more. They want better. I think it depends on where you live. My town has about k people and I found no quality on okcupid that wasn't fake. Tinder is much better. I've had a couple tinder matches that never responded to me on okcupid HB and there are many more s which are nonexistent on cupid.

Tons of spambots though. OKCupid on the other hand is loaded with attactive women, many of whom are joining a recent polyamory movement. Online dating gives the illusion of having a lot of opportunities. All those matches with hot chicks gives us hope that she's actually someone we "got.

But it's an illusion of abundance. She's just pixels on a screen. Most of them just want validation. You might not even meet her. A good number of women join these sites because they just got dumped by their alpha ex, and need a quick boost of validation. She'll do it for a month, then quit her account. That's not a the best dating pool to work in. That's why there are so many unexplained soft nexts on these dating apps. In fact, the loss of productivity at work or during projects while you answer texts from women takes time out of your day.

At least in person, you know you'll just be doing it during happy hour, which is a designated time to let loose and not deal with work.

The advantage of meeting women in person is that you immediately know how it's going and are automatically a notch higher in SMV because you're right there, in-the-flesh, and she doesn't have to be embarrassed that she met you online -- which only a few short years ago was considered "nerdy.

Sometimes, you may even gain a good male friend and wingmang in the process. You can't get that hunched over a phone in a dark room. The only advantage online dating has vs real life is if your real-life approach skills are abysmal.

But what I found is, when you can do it in real life really well, you will meet women far better than any you can meet online. Intentional day game requires travel to a locale and approaching 1 girl at a time with mixed results and across a long amount of time. Effective online dating sites allows me to approach upwards of 50 women at once, allows more elements of the encounters to be controlled i.

what she see vs. Just this week I've attained 3 plates from POF and 1 plate from Tinder without ever having to go out on a date or leave my apartment. We message, we text, I invite them over, we have sex, they come back a couple days later. On terms of ease it's like ordering a pizza every day vs.

driving to the pizzeria daily and waiting. Sending girls one word responses is the brunt of communication involved in this online dating approach. While the guide is long, the process itself is very simple and convenient. Going out to a bar or club is not. You're still the victim of extraneous circumstances outside of your control which drastically effect your likelihood of success.

She could be having a bad day. Her father could've just died. ASD could be in overdrive as her friends are present.

She could've come with her boyfriend. There are women in relationship abound in clubs. At least with online dating, she's more likely to choose to get on the site when she's in a good mood and open to the possibility of meeting someone. If she's on a dating site, you already know that she's openly identifying as single without needlessly putting up a facade as she might do in a club ASD, around friends, came with another guy, etc. It removes a lot of guesswork. The advantage of meeting women in person is that you immediately know how it's going and are automatically a notch higher in SMV because you're right there, in-the-flesh, and she doesn't have to be embarrassed that she met you online.

Women aren't inherently ashamed about meeting a guy online, especially if he's attractive. And if they are, they'll just lie. Hell, Fine China and I met off of Tinder and we've told people we met in a bookstore for months. The story gets more and more convoluted every time she tells it.

So long as we're having sex, what she tells other people doesn't matter in the slightest. I personally find it hilarious. No to nitpick, but there have been a lot changes in "a few short years", yet the concept of online dating has always been prevalent. A "few short years" ago, Myspace was the only true dominant social media site. And yet, even on Myspace, people met and fucked all the time. The only difference between then and now is that sites like Tinder and POF are solely dedicated to that interaction, while sites like Myspace and Facebook remain multifaceted.

But even still, people meet up on Facebook and fuck to this day. New sites, same strategy. Also, there is something to be said about being out in the real world and developing people skills.

If you mean day game, okay. But it's not as though the women you meet up with off of dating sites aren't going to talk with you after meeting in person.

Or that dates won't arise from some of the interactions. Most people wouldn't arrive at a club, meet a guy and ask him to wingman for him. They'd bring a friend they had prior that they felt they could trust.

Even then, you're needlessly crutching yourself in a process that only requires one person. To use your pizza analogy, yes sometimes I like a quick slice or a sloppy delivery, but the absolute best pies are the ones you have to go in person, sit and wait.

Some of the best restaurants in the city don't even deliver. I'm not disagreeing with the fundamentals of anything you've said about online dating itself, except for one main thing -- the recommend amount of time for the average man to dedicate using it.

I'm not talking about you, I'm talking about men in general. Also, there are plenty of hot women who will never, ever be online, ever. Believe me, there's a lot of them out there, I've met, talked to and fucked them.

They are not online. They think it's scary. Or they tried it and erased it after a week. Why would she be online if she's getting a hundred approaches every day? I know one plate who has never been online. She just tried OKCupid a few weeks ago. Ran into her, she said she has over messages and she doesn't know what to do, she says she's probably going to delete it, it's taking too much time out of her day.

She still texts me regularly for me to come over, because I met her in real life. But again, this is totally based on where you live. I live in a large city, so going out is actually pretty enjoyable and not a chore, it's literally around the corner.

I can understand if one lives in a small community where staying at home and chatting with women while sitting on the couch eating cheetos is favored. What some of my buddies do is, we will go out early, and fiddle with our apps for the first half hour before any real women show up at whatever place we're at. Then we put away our phones and go in for the real stuff -- the unexpected. The real stuff is almost always better.

In all sincerity, give it a shot. Thanks for this. It's so hard because as far as your advice on messaging, it flies in the face of what women say they want, and what I was stupid enough to listen to for so long. No wonder I had no success. I'm talking about when the conversation dies. Am I the only one that is supposed to initiate? If the conversation dies online, you ask for her number. If it dies and you wait to long to ask, you're done. If you're texting and it dies, that's fine.

More oft than not, she'l reach back out in a few days. Most women aren't used to guys killing convos. It'll intrigue her if anything. If she ends with "yeah" or "ok" or anything that ends the conversation, you ask for her number.

If she asks you more questions, you say "only in person" or some similarly succinct response until she reaches a conversational conclusion. also after she asked you what you're looking for and you say "friends" what do you usually say after? what's your next topic? Depends on her response. In case of no 14 I tend to chose location in which there is also something else to do so in case she didn't show up I don't have the time wasted I always need to drive up to the city.

Are you confident that going straight to "What're you looking for" is always the best approach? I just had a girl message me first, complimenting my picture where I'm shirtless. Then a couple messages later I said "what're you looking for on tindr" and she stopped responding.

Yes, you are thinking like a man. You asked in a clarifying way that merits a concise and rigid answer. Keep things open and fluid. Girls keep asking me, "am I supposed to be looking for something? How should I respond? Just be a little more direct "what kind of man are you looking for" seems to work for me. Like OKC asks you a ton of stupid questions and I think it's one of the worst for what our goals are here. I'm in Orlando, Florida. Hot or Not has your younger girls of all ethnicities; not to mention a lot of them might be jail bait.

POF is solid; I do like the voice message option; though it might curtail some women from giving out their numbers. They just send VM after VM which sucks too. Then there's Tinder. Definitely not great, I can feel it's been on a steady decline since they made the premium version. Are there any other sites you guys recommend? Here is my bio. I definitely don't think it's elite but I do seem to get a solid rate of return.

Thoughts on how to improve? Animals are cool. I like to surf and drive fast. Anything else, just ask. So for example a guy like me, who isn't in as good of shape as Omlala, can't really compete on Tinder and POF where girls are totally focused on physical attraction. On OKC, other attractive traits are more important, such as humor and intelligence. And you don't really need to put that much effort into OKC either. I don't answer any of those questions and only have minimal info on my profile, just enough for them to get an idea of who I am.

And as proof, I got 3 dates last week within days of creating a new profile. When I messaged girls, I was more focused on having an actual conversation with them. But the key is inner game and being outcome independent. Don't worry about getting their number immediately and just enjoy a friendly conversation with a stranger, the number exchange will come about naturally. In my experience, OKC girls just respond better to this approach than with the caveman, minimal messaging approach Omlala uses.

Omlala's guide helps immensely too. I took a lot of his advice and added some twist to it to fit me and my attractive traits. So yeah in conclusion, mating markets. OKC works, you just gotta be the right type of guy for it. And follow Omlala's profile layout but add your own flavor to it. What about the infamous potassium deflection? I thought that's why K died out. Too many wordplay aficionados. Being too blunt might make a visitor back off? I add them on facebook yadayada.

What do, especially if they try to casually interrogate you in their jellyness? Not the maintain intrigue part, simply the first encounter. It shows you don't really care. Honestly, I don't know. I'm going to try it out tonight so I'll let you know what results I get.

If you set up a date for a few days out, and don't talk to them in between, do you find they flake? I find that they flake less this way. Build intrigue high enough to make them curious, then disappear and make them chase. I keep it as breif as possible and cut it short often and early. Don't give them the benefit of validation without ever meeting you. I can understand leaving out the question mark, but leaving out apostrophes I don't think he ever mentioned omitting apostrophes besides, most phones will automatically put those in.

Anyway, most non-punctuation bothers me too. However, I'm starting to understand why we must initially abandon even simple things like commas.

It comes down to showing under-investment. She knows that you're super smart and educated, yet you still typed out that awful sentence??

The man who uses the Internet handle "Redditredpill" is having difficulty understanding women after going to a nightclub with some friends. As he tells it, "girls threw themselves at us for a sip of our vodka, to sit with us, to feel wanted. Imagine the reverse. I tried it. A table of girls, I went over to the girls on other side of club, and said 'Hi, can I get a sip of your champagne? Can I join you?

What was the response? Said exactly the same to the [women] that came up to us [ Point is, they tried [ And I tried to go to a group of girls and that failed too, as they thought they were superior. This may sound like the instigatory words of someone looking for a fight, sarcasm gone too far at best. But Redditredpill shared his story in earnest with a very specific community that empathizes with his perspective. The basis of this philosophy, which underpins almost all conversations in his community, is that females get away with things by virtue of being female.

Welcome to The Red Pill, an Internet community on Reddit founded on the general belief that women have it better than men. Red Pill is not a dating advice bulletin, but rather a forum for people — men, mostly — exploring an ideology that revolves almost exclusively around gender.

Those who "swallow the pill" maintain that it's men not women, who have been socially disenfranchised. Feminism is considered a damaging ideology and Red Pillers are quick to cite examples that bolster their points, some going so far as to argue that society is outright anti-male.

Red Pill followers have their own politics, language, and culture. And they're growing: Eight months ago, Red Pill had only followers.

Today, it has more than 15, Kheel Center The Red Pill is a collection of ideas encompassed by what its subscribers refer to as the "manosphere," a number of loosely-associated blogs that focus on masculinity and personal philosophy for men. At the surface level there's nothing terribly contentious about this, but if you click around one or two layers deeper, you'll find plenty of examples why chatter from this gallery regularly turns heads.

Like this :. Don't hate someone for something they CANNOT be. Women are, by nature, manipulative, attention-seeking, inconsistent, emotional, and hypergamous. Accept this truth. Once you do, you can game women for what they are not what you want them to be. The community's name is a tip of the hat to the truth-seeking attitude in The Matrix — Keanu Reeves pops a red pill to unplug his mind from a simulated world, freeing him to explore genuine reality. For Red Pillers, genuine reality goes something like this: Female oppression is a myth and men are the ones holding the short end of the stick.

That said, men and women are inherently different due to evolution, so each gender should carry out its designated role in society. Red Pill pays a lot of attention to that last part about sex — conversations on the forum are often about one's strategies for attracting mates, but there's a present if slightly lesser focus on self-improvement as well.

Community members motivate each other and update everyone on their progress as they lose weight at the gym and build muscle, though it's almost always for the end goal of increasing one's sexual eligibility. There seems to be an inherent contradiction at the heart of this community — it's an overwhelmingly male population advocating unpopular opinions on females, but it is almost entirely focused on attracting and seducing as many of them as possible. There is a subset of Red Pillers that want nothing to do with women called "MGTOW.

While there is absolutely an active, vocal female contingent to this group, its corresponding forum, Red Pill Women , is just shy of 1, subscribed members, a fraction of Red Pill's 15,plus. For a group whose ideology presents itself as a straightforward means of self-improvement and sociological liberation, Red Pill often muddies the water with highly-charged polemics on the proper way for men and women to relate to each other. Pickup-style artistry is often emphasized as the effective way to talk to and ultimately copulate with women.

It's called "game," one's strategy in approaching someone for romantic purposes. Good game technique turns a conversation with a woman into a guys vs. girls jousting match of the mind, every word carefully calculated to make one seem as attractive as possible. If this sounds like a disingenuous way to meet people, some Red Pillers see it as no worse than a woman wearing makeup :. Men tend to enjoy good looks, women tend to enjoy a strong, masculine personality. But while it's pretty standard for a woman to artificially improve her looks, most blue pillers tend to shun any attempt to grow a strong, masculine personality.

It's quite a double standard. It needs to be clear that there's a spectrum to Red Pill attitude, as there is with any ideology. Some members seem genuinely interested in it as a way to get a leg up socially, to break out of their proverbial shells. But on the other much louder end are members who come off as fundamentalist, those more likely to hold ideas about sex, politics, and society that would make a feminist cringe. This post lays out a point-by-point explanation of why Red Pill exists.

Many men "have trouble finding physical and emotional intimacy" and are given "terrible advice" as they try to remedy the situation.

Red Pillers don't want to isolate themselves from women per se , they want to "understand [them], have sex, and understand why 'game' works in our society and discuss its ramifications. A blog post called "The Misandry Bubble" functions as a Red Pill manifesto of sorts, and lays out an involved but accessible overview of ideas. It's a lengthy read worth of any armchair sociologist's time, and every word serves to further the idea that "the Western World has quietly become a civilization that undervalues men and overvalues women.

Red Pill thought extrapolates this to the extreme. The situation is "unfair to both genders, and is a recipe for a rapid civilizational decline and displacement, the costs of which will ultimately be borne by a subsequent generation of innocent women, rather than men, as soon as So Red Pillers' ideas and actions come from a place of resisting what they find to be a generally oppressive society.

This forum was born as a place to share game tactics, Red Pill theory, and to just blow off steam with like-minded folks. The prime candidates for this community generally seem to be men who, for whatever reason, have had bad luck with women or have been otherwise wronged by a female.

It can also be a person who's tired of what he perceives as a culture of misandry, seeing gender-based causes for social wrongs. And it can be for guys who just want to get laid more often and want advice on how to get there. Morpheus explained it to us like this: "[When men] realize their failures [with women] were within their control to avoid, it can induce a bit of anger [ But there is a temporary anger.

Because in our culture, women are mostly regarded as the 'good' sex, the one that does no harm. Our subreddit pulls back the curtain and says, 'Hey look, these women are human just like everybody else.

This group's distinct sociology has birthed a specialized vocabulary, almost a language, of sorts. There's a shorthand for referring to many common concepts inside Red Pill thought. One Red Piller describes what it's like to see his friend's wife "hit the wall. She spent her 20's riding the cock roundabout and [ She has become massively racist [ She loved watching gay men f in porn, just doesn't want them to be able to get married.

She has just become a hateful, miserable person to everyone. She is also on the 'all men are bastards' kick. He eventually shuns society as a whole : "For all intents and purposes, he does not exist. A urbanite might keep to his own apartment, while someone further out may simply head into the wilderness and go off-grid. This user shares a field report of getting a "snowflake" to send him a nude picture by appealing to her "naughty side" shortly after meeting her and her boyfriend:.

I ask her where her boyfriend is. She says 'You tell me! He's not here right now and when he is, he usually criticizes me. This woman is all emotional. Women go crazy when they're emotional.

Time to make her doubt this bf and look at me for some sexual release. Community members dissect Red Pill theory with each other, sharing "field reports" of their experiences, writing "rants" against feminism or other topics. For a group of socially-aware individuals disappointed in the current state of gender relations, there's not much activism, so to speak.

By Morpheus's own admission, Red Pill doesn't do much offline. A majority of our goals are personal and interpersonal improvement. Not really something to write your congressperson for. Return of Kings This comic right gets at the general tone of the Red Pill worldview. One user cites this personal experience with society's anti-male attitude. He loves lifting weights because he enjoys getting stronger and pushing himself, but his family makes fun of him for doing so.

They lob accusations of wasted time and money at him, telling him that girls don't like muscular men, only gay men do. He concludes that his family is teasing him because his weightlifting is "not in the service of a woman, so it's bad and a waste of time. Other commonly-cited examples of our so-called misandrist society?

In some states cohabitation is considered a Common Law marriage — a man's common law wife could have him evicted from his own house.

There's plenty of discussion over gender-based news items: The woman who got less than four years in jail for cutting off her husband's penis to make sure he couldn't impregnate any other women.

Stories like these and the ensuing discussion and debate lead to the worldview that society isn't fair enough for men :. Men are restricted in their speech and conduct. VAWA [the Violence Against Women Act], which has a "must arrest" policy in a domestic violence call. Women can assault and beat men in public with impunity and the tacit support of feminists. There are new social customs to constrain most men.

Red Pill: Dating advice turns into radicalization,Stories worth watching (15 Videos)

AdFind Your Special Someone Online. Choose the Right Dating Site & Start Now!Types: All Ages Dating Sites, Senior Dating Sites, Gay Dating Sites AdCreate an Online Dating Profile for Free! Only Pay When You Want More Features! Make a Free Dating Site Profile! Only Pay When You're Ready to Start Communicating! AdEveryone Knows Someone Who's Met Online. Join Here, Browse For Free. Everyone Know Someone Who's Met Online. Start Now and Browse for Free The Real Story of January 6 - Exposing the Fedsurrection on Red Pill News. Red Pill News. Sep 1; Biden Regime’s Dangerous Rhetoric - Exposure Complete on Occam’s Razor Ep. Red Pill News. Sep 1; Patriot Roundtable with Ivan Raiklin & Patel Patriot - Devolution & the Pence Card on Red Pill News. Red Pill News. Aug 31; FBI Agent Removed by Force - Tim Thibault a St. Louis premier recording and mastering services. ProTools and MFiT (mastered for iTunes) certified!  · It's a term made famous by 'The Matrix,' but almost two decades after the movie's release, 'Red Pill' has been co-opted by internet communities who think everything they've been told about society ... read more

Using decent grammar will decrease your number of hits but hopefully increase the average quality and thereby increase your likelihood of connecting with a plateable woman. I know one plate who has never been online. What was the response? If she messages you first, quickly becomes sexual, gives out her number much faster than expected, begs to visit you with no shit tests or in a short amount of time, be skeptical. She feels ugly because she stood by some sexy girl at the gym the past two hours? Now you will not be a dating site guy but a 'new friend' to her.

Perfect grammar signals overinvestment pretty consistently, red pill online dating. If the conversation dies online, you ask for her number. Read those profiles, and you will quickly learn how boring and fucking basic the majority of them are. Learn from your opponent. Avoid single mothers.

Categories: